People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things; other people learn by reading about things; others learn by listening to people talk about things. Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your choice.
Which is the best method for learning? This is a contentious issue, people maintain the disparate opinions. From my perspective, the best way of learning is doing things by ownself inasmuch as the following reasons.
First, people experience the learning by doing their activities and it is memorable than the others methods. Learning by listening or reading can be easily forgettable. For instance, when I study the science in school level, I can not remember the material which was studied by reading. However, when I performed the practical on Ohm’s law of electricity, then I always remember and that experience assisted on the house wiring.
Second, we can facilely understand true knowledge and information while learning by doing things. The conception drawn from the reading and listening is a grueling process. For instance, when I read the culture of Himalayans’ people through the lecture and books and I did not realize that the eating behaviors. Their behavior was unusual. But, when I visited the mountain area, then I knew the accurate behavior and appreciated that there was not so unusual, slightly difference behavior was performed by the Himalayans’ people.
Third, through learning by doing, people confidency is enhansing althouth the opponents say that it consumes more time. The knowledge without confidence is not applicable and the person can not survive in his trenches. For instance, my father is a farmer and he learns from the farming techniques through the practical or learning by doing. The experts always teach my father by doing the activities. As a result, my father is able to grow the diverse crops.
In conclusion, the best way of learning through doing. This is because we can get the valuable experience, understand the true knowledge and our confidence level will be improved by doing something.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. Third, through learning by doing, people confidency is enhansing althouth ...
^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l will be improved by doing something.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24561403509 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8508097158 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4714342467 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8695652174 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577527984432 0.236089414692 245% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169675135329 0.076458572812 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195796147264 0.0737576698707 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317837140219 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.305644913177 0.0645574589148 473% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.