“People should not pay for public transportation” agree/ disagree
To many city dwellers nowadays, public transportation may be their one and only choice to be able to get around every day. Indeed, being a most convenient and economical means of traveling, it boasts a number of superior qualities compared with private cars. That is way the government is highly concerned about improvements in traffic conditions and invests heavily in the construction of a more advanced infrastructure. In recent years, a controversial proposal was brought before the public eye, suggesting that passengers not pay for the public transportation. Such an innovative idea might be reasonable in some aspects. However, in my opinion, doing away with fares completely is not realistic, but cutting down on them can be more applicable and beneficial.
Firstly, not paying for the public transport will exert an excessive financial burden on the government. Tremendous investments are being made to construct more road, build more overpasses and develop new bus and subway lines. In addition, due to the climb in petrol prices, the cost of running a vehicle has risen to historic levels. On the other hand, if people don’t pay for bus rides, some bus companies might reach the verge of bankruptcy. In order to maintain the continuous development of the public transport system, precautions ought to be taken in advance in case the government can no longer lee pip with the demand for traffic funds. Revenue collected from the passengers’ fares contributes to a portion of the total amount of money used to build and develop the city’s transport systems. Therefore, all citizens ought to shoulder the social responsibility to lend their support in a financial way. After all, they are the major beneficiaries.
Secondly, the capacity of current public transport is far from adequate in handling greater traveling demands. It is a common economic law that if demand far exceeds supply, a society might be in danger of a potential crisis. The same is true with the traffic system. Predictably, if people are allowed to use public transport free of charge, the number of passengers will explode. As a consequence, buses and subways will be overly crowded. Both travelers and drivers will face a nightmare. Quality of service and safety of traveling would never be well ensured and people might have to wait in even longer queues. Without a doubt, people’s normal life will be negatively affected. The entire transport system might end up in a mess, which will finally become a major crisis.
In fact, cutting down on fares could be a better solution. Cheaper and more convenient paying methods have proved an effective measure in solving traffic problems in many cities. Take the capital of China as an example. Beijing is one of the pioneer cities to charge less public transport fees by promoting the use of IC cards. Those who scan their cards after getting on the bus will be granted a discount. Today, urban dwellers in Beijing have witnessed the improved traffic conditions due to the reduction in car usage. In reality, similar measures are being taken by many other major cities around the world, which further justifies its effectiveness.
In summary, there are more hidden defects lying beneath this free-of-charge proposal than its possible benefits. Whether it should be finally implemented depends largely on the respective transport systems in different regions. Only when the traffic network is fully developed to the highest degree cab those predictable risks and drawbacks be totally eliminated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-06-22 | meet96301 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | danielkim736 | 83 | view |
- solving questions using our own knowledge and experience or asking other people for advice 90
- has technology made children less creative than they were in the past 90
- children should not be allowed to play computer games 73
- People should not pay for public transportation agree disagree 95
- land for human needs or endangered animals 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 907, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a financial way" with adverb for "financial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al responsibility to lend their support in a financial way. After all, they are the major benefici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ge proposal than its possible benefits. Whether it should be finally implemented depend...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, after all, in addition, in fact, in summary, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2981.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 573.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20244328098 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89687440428 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 323.0 212.727598566 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56369982548 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 920.7 618.680645161 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2337070943 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9696969697 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222200331715 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049965979174 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702948588966 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118064093901 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809002182112 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 86.8835125448 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.