Nobody can deny the fact and truth that animals play a vitally important role in every person's life, and they are considered quite critical and crucial. Moreover, they are a worldwide known reality that animals formulate the lifespan of all human beings. Based upon all conducted studies, research, and statistics, one may state that animals should be treated like family members. Undoubtedly, I totally agree with this viewpoint for so many varied and different reasons.
On one hand, animals live in our homes and interact with us as a member of the family. More than that, Take a dog as an example, many families have a dog in their houses. They feed, walk, and shower them. Therefore, in other word, they treat them as real family members. Furthermore, By treatment the pets like one of family, we teach our children how to take care of their brothers and sisters and also have a high sense of responsibility
On the other hand, pets have a spirit. They can feel about each family member. Sometimes a couple who is unable to have children will adopt pets and treat them like babies. In addition, some people are unable to walk for that, animals in their homes can help them. Actually, pets can provide them a great service such as helping them to walk in unfamiliar areas. Frankly speaking, these pets are caring for their owners like family members, and for this reason, they should be treated like family.
Heading out of all previously mentioned reasons, I can sum up and conclude that animals should be treated as a family members due to the fact that they are taking care of us like a family, and because we interact with them as well as learn from them how to be responsible and patient at the same time .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... play a vitally important role in every persons life, and they are considered quite cri...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...responsible and patient at the same time .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, frankly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67656765677 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38034052928 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541254125413 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6573597466 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4666666667 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317431243484 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105968625774 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121160369007 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199441113055 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537331181086 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.