The reading states that humans can present permanently on Mars or the Moon, but it is impossible human presence on Venus, and it provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the spacecraft can reach 50 KM on Venus' atmosphere, and he refutes each of the author's points.
First, the author of the reading claims that the pressure of Venus' surface atmosphere is greater than the pressure of the earth's surface atmosphere. The professor says that the pressure on 50 Km far away from Venus' surface is equal to the pressure of the earth. Therefore, the spacecraft will not crush.
Secondly, the reading says that there is no water on Venus. However, the professor says that Venus' atmosphere at 50 Km is full of CO2 and sulfuric acid. Therefore, the spacecraft can use these gases for obtaining oxygen and water.
Finally, the reading states that a small amount of sunlight reaches Venus' planet's surface. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the clouds on 50 km far the surface thin so a lot of the sunlight can reach and spacecraft can use this light and the reflected sunlight to charge the power-cell to produce the energy.
In conclusion, the three points made by the lecture contrast with the reading. The first, second and third points in the lecture demonstrated that human is impossible to survive on Venus is in doubt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore, the spacecraft will not crush. Secondly, the reading says that there is...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e gases for obtaining oxygen and water. Finally, the reading states that a small...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the power-cell to produce the energy. In conclusion, the three points made by ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87553648069 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58459625109 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484978540773 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6723543957 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123596331781 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495039920968 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06695333741 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742454229019 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548982279062 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.