medical electronic records are more important than paper records. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view?
Nobody can deny the fact and the truth that technology plays a vitally important role in every person's life, and it is considered quite critical and crucial. Moreover, it is a reality worldwide known that technology is a key factor that formulates the lifespan of all human beings. Based on all the conducted statistics, research and studies, one states that storing patient's medical records in electronic databases has several advantages over traditional paper-based records. heading out of all my own experiences and observations, I totally agree with this statement for so many varied and different reasons.
First, medical electronic records are more valuable than paper records by reducing the costs of the store. My own experience is a compelling example of this. several years ago, when I was a manager in a local hospital, we save not only a lot of money by using electronic records but also a lot of time.
Secondly, medical e-records are more important because they prevent errors even though the poor handwriting may do error when the staff enters the data into the system. A small example may give light to this point. For instance, two years ago, my brother got a job as medical assistance. He has done many error typing but the system always gave him an alert red flag and corrected the error automatically.
Finally, medical e-records are more useful than traditional records. electronic records aid research in many ways such as making the research possible to gather large amounts of data and to draw out the needed information.
heading out of all the previously mentioned discussions, I can sum up and conclude that the medical electronic records take precedence over the paper records because e-records are more important and due to the fact that e-records are more useful as well as more valuable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...plays a vitally important role in every persons life, and it is considered quite critic...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Heading
...s over traditional paper-based records. heading out of all my own experiences and obser...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Several
...rience is a compelling example of this. several years ago, when I was a manager in a lo...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Electronic
...e more useful than traditional records. electronic records aid research in many ways such ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Heading
... draw out the needed information. heading out of all the previously mentioned dis...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08940397351 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76027292457 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8492106305 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368862423215 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116074569343 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102470258275 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197057819699 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471455864718 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.