Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a doubt, most governments try to reduce their societies' issues and solve their problems. Actually, they should have priorities for the work and some of them are top of the list for spending the money. Some people believe that they improve internet access is more important than some other issues like public transportation systems for governments, so they spend on the internet. Personally, I think that improving public transportation is more necessary than internet access for every city and country. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, with the rapidly growing population, most countries face air pollutions which can cause many diseases for humans and other creatures. So the governments need to solve this terrible problem in an urgent way. They should improve the public transportation system immediately because the main reason for the air pollution is the use of the fuels for cars and vehicles. For example, in my city, most people should have a personal car because there is no urban train or public transportation buses for those individuals to use instead of using a personal car, therefore all morning we hear about our city's high rate of air pollution on the radio. If we could use the buses daily and easily, the air pollution problem would have been solved.
Besides, governments prefer to spend money to improve public transportation instead of improving Internet access because most people have good accessibility to the internet networks through their laptops, smartphones, or their tablets. Also, the internet is used in various high-tech house tools such as TVs and refrigerators. Therefore people's accessibility to the internet doesn't need much money to improve.
In conclusion, governments spend more money to improve public transportation than improve internet access. This is because of the great effect of the transportation situation on air pollution. Also, this is because of the public satisfaction with the internet situation among the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an urgent way" with adverb for "urgent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nts need to solve this terrible problem in an urgent way. They should improve the public transpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...se tools such as TVs and refrigerators. Therefore peoples accessibility to the internet d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e peoples accessibility to the internet doesnt need much money to improve. In conclus...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, if, so, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26073619632 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90116108987 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0418911306 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1875 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376562805117 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138580687307 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126261531968 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258910977271 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696419181092 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.