It is obvious that education plays a vital role in humans’ life. it affects not only living conditions of people but also the future of a society. Different factors influence improving the quality of education in schools containing having well-equipped laboratories, libraries, and so on. Another important factor that should be considered is assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency in schools. I strongly believe that it is much better for students to be allowed to evaluate teachers by themselves instead of assessing teachers by their colleagues. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think in schools, it is a good opportunity for students to evaluate their teachers from different aspects including teachers’ knowledge, experience, behavioral traits, and etc. it allows teachers to be aware of the opinion and views of students towards themselves and to know their weakness points. It will help teachers to improve their abilities in order to increase the efficiency of teaching and learning in classrooms. In addition, students can better assess their teachers than other teachers because of the fact that they know their teacher more than others. As a result, their opinions about their teacher’s teaching ability and other attributes can be more constructive. For example, we had a teacher in biology class last term, and he used old materials to teach instead of up-ta-date ones; thus, students are not satisfied with this issue. The process of evaluation of teachers by students enabled them to convey their attitudes towards the way of teaching of their teacher. Consequently, he changed his instructional materials and utilized newer ones to teach in later terms.
Moreover, rating teachers by other teachers is not reasonable. They do not have exact information about the methods of teaching other teachers because they do not attend classrooms. Factors which they consider to judge other teachers are different form elements that are important for students. As a result, it is obvious that assessment of teachers by their colleagues cannot help improvement of the teaching procedure and do not have positive effects on children’s learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...lays a vital role in humans' life. it affects not only living conditions of p...
^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...owledge, experience, behavioral traits, and etc. it allows teachers to be aware of the o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...sess their teachers than other teachers because of the fact that they know their teacher more than other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider judging'.
Suggestion: consider judging
...t attend classrooms. Factors which they consider to judge other teachers are different form eleme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, i think, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45375722543 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05588655673 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528901734104 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1643846899 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50380690986 0.236089414692 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169284020623 0.076458572812 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126729730401 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368098154174 0.150856017488 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275408223183 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.