Smart phones are revolutionary electronic devices. Due to the affordable prices today, almost every household in the world owns atleast one smart phone. While this device is very beneficial, when it is not used for right purposes, it can be hazardous. Therefore, it is better to forbid young children from using smart phones.
With the advent of social media, most people are being affected with phone addiction. It is not unknown that most youngsters spend lot of their precious time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, twitter and so on. Since, surfing the social media does not require a lot of cognitive function, it does not help improve an individual's intellect. This can be particularly hazardous for young children as that is the age where many body parts are malleable and therefore, they must use this time should be used for their cognitive development. Hence, young children cannot waste their precious time on smart phones, instead they must utilize this time for their development.
Smart phones are giving rise to many unprecedented health problems. Most people who spend a lot of time on phones, tend to stay indoors and therefore, do not receive the required sunlight and do not perform prescribed amount of exercise that a body needs. This leads to Vitamin D deficiency which can give rise to many fatal diseases and lack of exercise can lead to bone problems and obesity. Excessive use of smart phones can also cause postural problems, people tend to bend their necks for long time which eventually causes upper back problems. Young children who need to develop strength and immunity in the younger age itself can be addicted to smart phones and develop all these problems at that age. These problems can decrease their immunity and lead to complications at a very young age. Young children must utilize their energy rather to play outdoors and develop immunity from many diseases, something that is not possible after a certain age.
Everything has its pros and cons. While, smart phones are proving to be useful for many mundane tasks, it is also leading to many new age problems like cyber bullying. Recent surge of cyber crime cases, shows the dark side of the internet. Young children, who are ignorant and immature of these crimes can fall prey to many criminals online. For example, recently a game called blue whale lead to the death of many youngsters across the world. Apparently, this game challenges young kids to take up dangerous tasks and naive children fell prey to this monstrous scheme and ended up losing their precious lives. For most of such schemes, young children are a target as they are naive and hence, parents should protect their children from being manipulated by such criminals on the internet by forbidding them using smart phones or by closely monitoring them while using phones.
In conclusion, smart phones can be very useful as well as very dangerous. Therefore, in order to protect their children from dangers online and any potential health issues, parents must not provide their child with smart phones until they reach a certain age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e function, it does not help improve an individuals intellect. This can be particularly haz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, hence, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46744011793 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481695568401 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2131630913 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.76 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238037003422 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077642290104 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596787927547 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1632244173 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433019936527 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.