Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Earth, our planet is the place where we live, so it is our duty not to damage and take care of it. Human activities are harming earth, directly or indirectly. Some people agree that human activity damages earth, while others think that human activity makes the earth a better place to live. In my opinion, earth is harmed to a great extent by human activities and the possible reasons for this stand are as follows.
Greenhouse effect explains about damage to the ozone layer of earth. Human activities involve use of wood, water and fuel to a great extent. Wood comes from cutting tress leading to deforestation. This deforestation shows effect on amount of rainfall in different regions on earth. Rainwater is very important for various reasons, for example in the field of agriculture water plays a key role. Enormous use of fuel like petrol, diesel and kerosene leads to deadly effects on earth’s atmosphere as it creates air pollution. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere of earth determines the heat in the earth’s atmosphere. And the amount of reflected heat waves into the space reduces as it gets trapped in the earth’s atmosphere. So, more use of fossil fuels will produce tremendous amount of greenhouse gases which shows its effect by raising the temperature on earth and also produces seasonal change globally. So, in my view, its high time to understand these disturbances to the naturally occurring greenhouse effect and should think of alternative options to stop this harm on earth.
Mining harms earth in many ways like soil erosion, contamination of ground water and surface water by the chemicals from mining processes. Mining areas often leads to few harmful effects on the health of locality in that particular area. Chemicals through this process and also from other industrial work runs through water in the rivers and houses. And as this water is consumed by sea water creatures and human beings, this breaks the living cycle of the sea creatures and produces diseases to human beings. Some carcinogenic chemicals make some humans to suffer from cancer, which in turn makes miserable life. So, its prime duty of the grant authority to look about such harmful activities and to shut down the gate for building industries near the residential area or also for any other mining activities.
To advance in technology is good, but with the cost of damaging earth and its ecosystem is the bad idea. Everyone should respect the land where we live and should also take steps to maintain the ecosystem, which will provide favourable atmosphere for human beings and other living creatures on the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ing processes. Mining areas often leads to few harmful effects on the health of lo...
^^
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd other living creatures on the earth.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, for example, in my opinion, in my view, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02054794521 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62800066238 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513698630137 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3859330515 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9545454545 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340833643941 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110718535417 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107008203125 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23558595278 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136438466268 0.0645574589148 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.