Undoubtedly, we live in a rapidly changing world. Humans every day invent new technology and produce new tools in order to facilitate their lives. Some people argue that human activities are damaging the earth; others disagree. In my point of view, I believe that our activities have caused catastrophic ramifications for the earth and have made it a worse place to live. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First and foremost, the pollution caused by human activities is inevitable these days, even with the most intelligent technologies. We pollute the earth's air by the harmful gazes that emitted from our vehicles, we pollute the earth's seas and rivers by wastes and plastics came from our factories, and holistically, we still damage the ecological system by our pollutants day on and day out. To illustrate this idea let us consider the following example. I remember when I was ten years old, our family used to go to my uncle's valley in order to inhale clean air and also to escape from cites noise pollution every weekend. But unfortunately, three years ago, the government decided to build a factory two kilometer away from the valley. The factory discharges, every day, many gallons of toxic gases to the air. Moreover, within a few months, it made the water in the river near the valley unsuitable for human uses. As we can see, the pollutants that outcome from our activities are harmful to the planet.
Second, human activities are changing our earth's climate in a direct and indirect manner. The rapid and uncontrolled population growth constantly bleed natural resources. For instance, we do not hesitate to cut lots of trees in order to build houses. We constantly exhaust the lands by over cultivates in order to provide foods for our families. All these activities and others are the essential causes of the climate change we are seeing these days.
In sum, our activity does harmful our earth significantly. Not only we pollute our planet. But also, we changed its climate and destroyed its ecological system. We should all take responsibilities and work assiduously in order to protect our planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...vernment decided to build a factory two kilometer away from the valley. The factory disch...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, for instance, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96438356164 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76227161814 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.048774896 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3636363636 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5909090909 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163561314263 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055658211269 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829382822077 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115378454572 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767783807966 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.