Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year. Others believe that students should have severe short vacations throughout the year.
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether student should have a long vacation once a year or divide into smaller pieces throughout the year. Although, taking long vacations has its clear benefits, the vacations distributed throughout the year eventually are more preferred for students.
To begin with, the long vacations are conjugated with high costs, which are incurred for a long stay. By reducing the time spent on the vacations students can reduce the initial outlay of money for longer vacations and divide it into smaller pieces, especially in terms of money shortage. However, the long stay fosters the maintenance of relationships between and among the students and their relatives. The rise of the availability of international studying programs for foreign students is positively correlated with the number of foreigners joining the schools. Those students are specially interested in long vacations, which, in turn, give them the possibility to return home for a long stay. By staying longer at home with beloved ones students recharge their batteries and return in better conditions, than those who stay far away from families.
Nonetheless, fractioning the vacation days into shorter stays allows students to join their families more frequent and stay recharged for a prolonged time. To be specific, the sessions in schools are designed in a such way so when the undergraduates become tired after exams period, the vacation begins. This is how the module system works in maintenance of students health and abilities to absorb information from lectures.
By the same token, by taking frequent but short vacations undergraduates avoid large one-time cash outflows. That is not a surprise, that shorter vacations are usually cost less than longer stays. Shorter stays could be funded through earning money between semesters or acquiring debt, however increased debt burden is not favourable for undergraduates. However, by engaging in summer internships student can obtain relevant job experience to expand their future career. So shorter stays are more preferable for students living on scholarships and loans.
All in all, staying shorter for vacations inculcates us the ability to manage students time and eventually boost their careers by participating in internships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-20 | Winner_007 | 90 | view |
- Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world Recently there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today s world Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed First defenders of zoos say 76
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 81
- Global Issues 3
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether student should have a long vacation onc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'internships'' or 'internship's'?
Suggestion: internships'; internship's
...aduates. However, by engaging in summer internships student can obtain relevant job experie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45378151261 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87146134799 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2019410851 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.529411765 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280153702046 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970014057721 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073359942063 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172864843389 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100830467847 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.