Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer.
Opinions vary with the regard to the question whether mandatory or optional attendance has any difference on the quality of university education. Although open form of undergraduate education has its benefits, the compulsory attendance is difficult to overestimate. The class attendance increases the rate of knowledge perception and fosters interaction between and among students and professors.
The attendance on demand enables the students to organise their time more effectively, reducing the time spent on minor disciplines. To be specific, the minor classes fill at least twenty per cent of overall curricula. Released time could be redistributed to more essential activities such as self-development or even relaxation. It is a well-known fact that the less unnecessary classes students attend, the more productive they are on major seminars and lectures. The statistics demonstrate the higher rate of concentration among student who take day offs from their regular studying process than among those who blindly attended classes in the college curriculum.
By the same token, the students attending classes have an opportunity to be a part of academia community and realise their ambitions in the school’s clubs. For example, by attending college clubs and professional communities students can boost their knowledge in the field of study they prefer. Clubs are often designed in the way of master classes or real business cases, which provide the closest to real life experience. Moreover, undergraduates firmly believe in the helpfulness of personal meetings with professors. To be specific, professors from Stanford university are know for providing funding for student’s start-ups, thus helping talented people to rise. Additionally, professors from well-known schools often have their own businesses and much practical experience in the fields of study. This collaboration may positively affect students by sharing the natural living experience of lecturers. However, it is a kind of a quest to find an appropriate class with such strong opportunities and hidden abilities to build a trusting relationships with professors.
Furthermore, the attendance of clubs may help students to make appropriate contacts, which may be useful in later stages of career development. That is not a secret that networking plays a huge part in our day-to-day life, and in the modern era student use such applications as LinkedIn as their “working social networks”.
All in all, the networking inculcates us the ability to interact effectively with each other and make much more informed decisions throughout our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions vary with the regard to the question whether mandatory or optional attendance has an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...professors from Stanford university are know for providing funding for student’s sta...
^^^^
Line 3, column 925, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...perience of lecturers. However, it is a kind of a quest to find an appropriate class with...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1042, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relationship'?
Suggestion: relationship
...nd hidden abilities to build a trusting relationships with professors. Furthermore, the atte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, at least, for example, kind of, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61964735516 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19371229682 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584382871537 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.380159426 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.421052632 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277347203767 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804362610644 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426844166 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134664303887 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582243168047 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.