People cautiously decide which method they use in work. Some people prefer to do work by hand, while others believe that using machines in work is better. It's hard to judge which method is more significant. From my perspective, I agree with the statement the people should do their work using machines, for the following reasons.
The first reason that using machines is abundantly clearly that machines can improve our work efficiency. That's because machines deal with the many kinds of work better than humans. For instance, office record employees type in computer faster than write in hand. With the assistance of computer, they can record the meeting materials faster, since typing is an excellent example that machines do better than human. In other words, machines are designed for the purpose of reducing individual's work repeat time. From this view, we could draw the conclusion that using machine is beneficial to improve people's work efficiency.
Furthermore, the second reasons worth mentioning is that machines deal with the large scale work while people can merely solve problems on by one. This phenomenon can be greatly attributes to the fact that machine are tools that can handle repeat work quickly and easily. According to the statistics data, the corporations that among the Fortune Top 500 all use the computer databases to store their data and documents. These machines are regarded as vital to reserve large scale data. In the opposite site, it's ridiculous to think that storing these huge amounts of data by hand documents. Then we can easily find that we should encourage people to use machines in work in an attempt to handle the large scale work.
Besides, it's true that in some circumstances people need to spend a lot of money in purchasing machines. On the contrary, doing work by hand is relatively cheap. For instance, installing computers will bring in a huge pressure in a company's budget. That's why many people hold the view that they have a tendency to doing work by hand. Nevertheless, although purchasing machines is expensive to a certain extent. From a long term perspective, improving work efficiency can save a lot of money for companies in the end. Then we can conclude that doing work using machines has more benefits than drawbacks.
In a nutshell, doing work by using machines can both improve our work efficiency and deal with the large scale tasks. Besides, although buying machines may cost a lot of money, using machines in work can save more money for a long term than doing work by hand. Judging from all above-mentioned situations, we may easily reach the conclusion that we prefer to doing work with the assistance of machines.
- Some people like doing work by hand. Others prefer using machines. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 85
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people should choose a job that is similar to what parents did. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...chines can improve our work efficiency. Thats because machines deal with the many kin...
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...n a huge pressure in a companys budget. Thats why many people hold the view that they...
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG
Message: Did you mean 'do'?
... reach the conclusion that we prefer to doing work with the assistance of machines.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, while, for instance, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98440979955 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59796857698 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456570155902 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3145812618 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0769230769 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2692307692 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88461538462 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30872097805 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105736782592 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965908168191 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225492755985 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11004087628 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.