The Internet has been changing the world in every aspect of your lives. This is an undeniable fact. However, few people try to exploit the Internet to fool and scam others with fake information. The more people experienced frauds on the Internet, the more people assume that the Internet is harmful or malicious for them. I strongly disagree with what these people think, but I think the internet is helpful in a way that offers us a lot of valuable information.
To begin with, the scams and frauds through the internet happen rarely. It seems to occur every day but that is your illusions. Television and newspapers cover stories that attract people’s attention to increase readerships so that they keep reporting coverages about criminals, accidents, and gossips. Even though the incidents caused by internet users and false belief floating the internet, it occurs not as many as you think. There’s a term “agenda-setting” referred to as a phenomenon that people persist in its importance according to the salience of news coverage. Furthermore, if you would like to avoid the possibility of being fooled by fraud information on the internet, you can learn how to distinguish its authenticity by checking the authority of the author and websites of the information.
On top of that, anyone can be the expertise in any field they are interested in through the information provided by the internet. Before the internet was invented, ordinary people had to depend on special people like professions to get specific knowledge. However, these days, people can access all kinds of information whatever they want and whatever they need. For example, my sister got sick and she searched online about her symptoms to figure out her illness and diagnosis herself. It was a kind of stomachache but seemed to be severe following online information. After that, she visited the doctor and said what she found and what her symptoms are. It was exactly the same as what she thought and read online, which led her to get proper cures in a short period. Take another example of this, my friend, she was interested in playing the acoustic guitar but she did not have time to go to physical places in order to learn. Finally, she decided to learn the guitar by online video clip and now she is good at it!
To sum up, I admit it is possible that the internet could be harmful and problematic. However, the actual amount of harmful effects is far less than you think, and people can access a lot of valuable information through the internet which enables them to specialize in the certain field they want to know.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- 21 Younger school children aged five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history 88
- When people consider a major purchase, which of the following has the greatest impact on their choices?1. Recommendation from friends2. Information from magazines3. Reviews from online communities 76
- T P O-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is speci 60
- Cars have made a greater impact on society than airplanes. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for example, i think, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91441441441 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8618212911 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538288288288 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5477928804 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.904761905 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190584067389 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563447459842 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518768770377 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126987508689 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052095580766 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.