There are myriad considerations or factors that everyone must take into account regarding expenses in outer space. As far as I am concerned, governments should allocate a little amount of money in finding out other planets or moon, but it is more important to spend money for humankind and environment’ needs on earth. I cling to this outlook for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, poverty is a great ongoing problem in today’s world, we have seen people who do not have the access to the basic needs. Governments must do something to provide poor families with essential facilities to live. Because they did not desire to be in that situation, they just came to a place with any kind resource and where it is too difficult, even impossible to succeed. For instance, I was shocked in Africa seeing how people can survive, it is incredible that they did not have either water or food, they hope someday when governmental associations invest some money to get them out of this horrible life. So this is how a government could spend money helping some worldwide poor parts.
Secondly, governments should focus on caring out the environment by investing in natural spaces or sawing more trees. If we want to have our planet alive for some years more, we need to save it from destruction. Nowadays, there are not as many trees as in the past, so the earth has lost its lungs –trees-. To clarify this point, let me take my town as an example, In Machala –a little Ecuadorian coast town- not many years ago did not have any natural spaces such as green parks, green areas, zoos, so forth. But, the new major came and built some parks and green areas. Now Machala has 5 natural parks where they are a lot of trees and 3 green areas which are seized to generate natural products. So this how governments should spend smartly the money.
To sum up, I strongly believed that governments have the responsibility to save this world, and in order to this, they need to invest in the world’s basic needs. because poor people should be living in better conditions, and green areas should be constructed so as to let our world live for many years more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...invest in the world's basic needs. because poor people should be living in better ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., and green areas should be constructed so as to let our world live for many years more....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69329896907 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61311610099 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0788114848 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.117647059 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33842672381 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105759825324 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958742380187 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214471884714 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747241400359 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.