In my view, preferring to allot the land to save the endangered animals is better for three reasons. While at first sight it seems that human needs are significant, ultimate development of the humans depends on the inevitable cycle of the earth in which humans are mere part.
Firstly, the extinction of a particular species directly or indirectly effects the humans. For overall development of the humans a balance between different species is necessary.For instance, humming bird which are near extinct condition is responsible for pollinating a particular a plant species in Mexico, expansion of the humans for housing caused the migration of these birds making the plants extinct. These plants are of medicinal value and are cure for myriad diseases in the area earlier. So, a mere expansion of the humans turning blind-eye to the other species ultimately effects humans.
Secondly, humans as a conscionable species on the earth must guard and protect the earth as it is not only the duty of humans but also a necessity as the ecological balance on the earth depends on every species. For instance, extinction of coral leaves in specific area makes the fish thrive on other means or migrate rendering the fisherman helpless and humans to be in lack of certain vitamins. In turn these coral leaves are extinct because of the lack of sunlight, that is impeded by the oil spills caused by the humans. So, since the ecological balance is a cycle, a disturbance in one species causes the disturbance in the whole cycle.
Thirdly, development of industries , deforestation of the forests for housing and farmlands adds to the pollution. In a survey it was revealed that, the pollution rendered by the animal grazing and the green house gases resulted from the agriculture contribute to the significant level. Although these practices are necessary for the survival of humans but the very practices are responsible for their miserable life. So, a balance is necessary and the result anticipated should address all the consesquences of the act.
In sum, an imbalance in the aforementioned factors causes in the catastrophic upshots making the humans the ultimate sufferer. So i disagree with the opinion that humans needs for farmland, housing and industries are significant than saving the land for the endangered animals.
- Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 83
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what type of neighbor is the best to have?-someone who is quiet-someone who we are similar to-someone who is supportiveUse specific details and examples in your answer. 66
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
... between different species is necessary.For instance, humming bird which are near e...
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
...cle. Thirdly, development of industries , deforestation of the forests for housin...
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
...ng the humans the ultimate sufferer. So i disagree with the opinion that humans n...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13984168865 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88032777452 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493403693931 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6827795719 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283813783897 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990586865343 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135431595203 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189560065632 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117631366579 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.