Many people think that contribuiting money to homeless people are the way to go; they feel sorry for them not having anything and assuming they will use the money to buy food. Personaly, I believe that you should not give away money to panhandlers. I feel this way for two main reasons that I will discuss in the following paragraphs.
First of all, homeless people are often seen using drugs or alchool. It is not unsuall to see them asking for cash on the strees claiming they are hungry. Perharps, they are hungry, but I have had thousands of experiences with baggers that would take my money and they would go directly to the liquor store. A life example that I have is when I was 18 years old walking downtown with my father on my city, a large metropoly, hence, having a vast population of beggers. A middle-age man apporached us requesting for a few bucks. He said that he was starving and had to take care of his two kids. Feeling sorry for this poor man, my dad picked up from his wallet $10 dollars, which was quite a bit for a charity. The man felt very happy, and we felt good for donating that money. However, a few minutes later, my mom texted us asking to buy wine for her special food at the liquor store. Arriving there, we saw this poor man walkng out there with a bottle of whisky. We felt betrayed by that man, therefore we decided to never give more money to baggers in our city.
Sencondly, I belive that the goverment should provide aid for baggers on the street. Politicians should make laws to give them a place to stay, to eat or some kind of condition that they could live. For instance, in my country they offer a meal plan for homeless people. Their intention is to diminish problems that occur when people donate money for them and they consume alchool. So far, this law has been doing well. People are more carefull when they see baggers asking money to buy food, because now they know that the goverment provides aid for them. Additionally, alchool problems among this population went down. This law brought many benefits for my country.
In conclusion, I'm in the opnion that you should not give money to the living population on the streets. That is because they usually use that money for unhealthy purporses and they should receive money from the goverment not from us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...efits for my country. In conclusion, Im in the opnion that you should not give ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52267303103 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3422556447 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517899761337 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4091168424 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9583333333 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135615193465 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433013502086 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281468694807 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884710318149 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318885164855 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.