Some universities focus on having excellent libraries, laboratories, and other facilities. Others focus more on hiring the most successful and qualified professors. Which system do you think benefits students more, and why? Include details and examples in your explanation.
Needless to say that education is not a preparation for life, but it is life itself. Therefore, nowadays, almost all high school graduates have striven to gain higher education that can guarantee them a secure career in the future. Recently, the amelioration of higher education has aroused many debates. Many people think that universities should focus on advancing their facilities like libraries and laboratories to gain a good reputation. However, from my perspective, I firmly believe that prestigious colleges should consider hiring skilled instructors a priority to help students to gain valuable knowledge. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoints.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that lecturers play the most significant role in the higher education process. To elaborate on that point, I undoubtedly believe that skilled lecturers can help students to grasp the fundamental knowledge and the practical applications of it. so it will qualify them to be excellent candidates in the future even in the presence of fierce competition. In addition to the priceless knowledge that scholars would gain, discussion with those knowledgeable instructors can also enable scholars to develop several skills like critical thinking skills that can certainly profound the comprehension of their academic curriculum. My experience is a relevant example to support this viewpoint; I vividly remember because of my pharmacology professor 's advice, guidance, and immeasurable support, I managed to conduct a unique research about a new medication for hepatitis while I was in college that enabled me not only to be graduated with honor but also promoted me to work in Glaxo, one of the most famous leading pharmaceuticals companies in my country. Based on what I mentioned, We can conclude that colleges should consider hiring skilled teachers a priority to help scholars to sharpen their professional skills.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that the reliance on technology could provide teachers will many supportive educative tools that may offset the absence of advanced facilities in the college. To shed light on this point, I firmly believe that expert lecturers still has a chance to wisely select many U tube explanation videos, online references, and abstracts of many studies conducted by international experts to expand scholars' horizons and profound their knowledge even in the absence of advanced facilities of the college. The article that I read in the New York Times can provide a piece of evidence on that point, according to a study conducted at Oxford University, statistics reveal that reliance on internet technology has enabled ninety-five percent of colleges in numerous states in the USA to enhance the academic performance of their graduates. As you can see, instructors along with technology are the motive power in the education process.
In conclusion, if we contemplate the mentioned reasons, we will soon realize that lecturers' role in the education process is more important than any other supplemental tool in education.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 64
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO INTEGRATED 40 3
- All university students should required to talk history courses not matter what is their field . 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 832, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ice, guidance, and immeasurable support, I managed to conduct a unique research a...
Line 5, column 855, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'unique research'.
Suggestion: unique research
...asurable support, I managed to conduct a unique research about a new medication for hepatitis wh...
Line 13, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...oned reasons, we will soon realize that lecturers role in the education process is more i...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44099378882 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08078708313 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.478853497 48.9658058833 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.588235294 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4117647059 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757757053451 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246618733155 0.076458572812 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275458424082 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504603233323 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267249230279 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.