Students learn more in large lectures classes than in small discussion classes. Agree/disagree
One of the most essential skills to learn in traditional classrooms is the ability to communicate effectively with other individuals. Student through their career must participate and discuss during classes. Thus, supporters, as me, will say that the small classes bring more benefits for learners than large lecture classes for several reasons.
To begin with, with fewer students, the opportunity to participate in the discussion increases. While a larger group of students does not have the time to give their opinion, a small amount of individuals may participate more. Hence, learners will develop substantial social skills, such as communication. Since the number of students is reduced, they can have more hours available to express their opinion, and they discuss the topic deeply. For example, when I was in my first year of the university, we were seventeen people in the room. Therefore, each of us has the chance to discuss a part of the topic. With this in mind, one time, the professor let us to give the biology class. Because we had plenty time, everybody talked about the global warming problems. First, a student talked about the introduction. Later, the others said about causes, solutions, and prevention. Since we had a lot of time available, everybody participated through the class.
Another good reason to have fewer students discussing is that individuals can acquire new knowledge listening the professor and classmates in an entertaining way. Although solo lectures enable professors to give classes in less time, persons learning can get easily exhausted, so they will stop paying attention to the instructor. However, in small size groups, professors give the students the responsibility to communicate among them. This method allows students to feel encouraged and interested in the class. For instance, in my last year of university, the anatomy instructor gave the topic in a bored way. He talked hours in individual lectures, for we were unfocused on the topics. Thus, we felt discouraged and tired to keep going to class. As a result, students did not participate or even attend to the class. After explaining the situation to the professor, he decided to split the class in two different groups. This time, the learners have to talk and ask questions to the professor. Consequently, by using this new method of learning the instructor gained the attention of students with a high level of success. As I mentioned, a large group of people does not bring benefits when acquiring new knowledge.
To sum up, there is no doubt that people obtain more knowledge when they are in small size classes. As it is stated previously, the advantages surpass the drawbacks of larger number of students. Not only do individuals have enough time to practice and participate during discussions, but they also learn in a most enjoyable way.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 70
- TOEFL integrated writing: Chaco housing 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to s 70
- The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientist have long wondered what cause 90
- endotherm animals 70
He talked hours in individual lectures, for we were unfocused on the topics.
He talked hours in individual lectures, but we were unfocused on the topics.
Sentence Length SD: 4.927 7.5
"Sentence Length SD is low" means that the essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentences varieties wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 466 350
No. of Characters: 2322 1500
No. of Different Words: 232 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.646 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.983 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.771 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 164 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 70 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.069 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.927 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.517 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.252 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.391 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5