Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that in order to have a sophisticated society with happy, health and professional people, government investment in primary schools is more important than increasing universities budgets. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that spending a huge amount of money to the education of common children is wrong and wast of money. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that for the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities.
First and foremost, a better educational background would be increased the number of prospective students enrollment to university. Children interests and desires shape during ten first years of their life. They start imagination about their future job, so an appropriate educational condition, facilities and teachers are determining factors in the evolution of their goals. For example, when I decided to become a biologist, it was after my first experience in the biology laboratory of my primary school. I had found frogs really amazing and decided to maintain their wild territory.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that proper education for young children can reduce crimes in society. For example, I am a member of volunteer community services. During my cooperation with this association I have realised that most of the people who are dealing with addiction, crims, serious family issues and emotional problems are uneducated. Thus, providing good education opportunities is specifically important in poor regions with a high violent rate to departing young children from an unhealthy environment and aware them of true life meanings.
Finally, yet importantly, it is very important that gifted students identified as soon as possible. If talented children did not recognise, for specific training, their intelligence will be faded and would not be flourished ever. People with outstanding cognitive function have a substantial role in the rate of science and technology progress of countries, because golden solutions always shape in keen minds.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that for the successful development of a country, governments should spend more money on the education of young children than spend money on universities. Because this plan could increase the number of academic educated people in future and can diminish the census of criminal behavior in society, and we can find more talented people in this way.
- TPO 47 3
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cellphone, online games and social networking websites. 73
- TPO 11 75
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... be increased the number of prospective students enrollment to university. Children inte...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, really, so, still, thus, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39225181598 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99385640815 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554479418886 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5150168011 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2941176471 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44642840318 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131351235125 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192376976924 0.0737576698707 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239251682146 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184188381677 0.0645574589148 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.