Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that the famous people like any other citizen have this right of desairable privacy. But unfortunaitely, they ahve not an adiquaite secure life . Contrary to this popular belifs there are still those who argue that the well-known entertainers now have enough privacy and the source of unsafity is just their own behavior in the society and the information they share in the poblic social networks, to attract people attention to themselves. However, I to a great extent, agree with this idea that the famous people deserve to have more privacy than they have now.
First and foremost, there is some missbeliefs in people minds that the famous people should be have very friendly relationship with their adherent and its means that people have this allow to communicate with famous people in any where and any time. For example, last week I when I had a lunch with my friend at the resturant, we meet a favorit actor on here where he was very angry from one person who want to take an photograph with him. Because the actor was in important discusstion with his wife and they man intrupt them. However, everybody need some privet time otherwise this kind of happens can treathened their mental healthy and happiness.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that some of social networks try to take advantage from their fame between people through using their name or sharing some of their privet photos in their websites to increase their veiwers. Sometime may some vouices people try to extortion from famous people by frightening them to transmiting some of their personal information in public. In addition, I know that there is some criminal groups in film industry or popular sports, who want to manipulat profits in these industries to their own favior. Event may through distribution of fake news about famous people to force them to accept their request.
Finally, yet importantly, the famous people like other one's are not exemt from mistake. Maybe they occoassionally be angry during driving but it is not true that poeple abuse fron this kind of event in oppose of them. Obvously, a driving debate do not affected our job position or our future life. So we should respect the right of the famous people similar to other one's.
On the basis of reasons that was mentioned above, I am convinced that well-known people deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Because in the present condition their happiness, healthy of social and faimily life of them is not aproperiate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., they ahve not an adiquaite secure life . Contrary to this popular belifs there a...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had'?
Suggestion: had
... minds that the famous people should be have very friendly relationship with their a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'communicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: communicating
...d its means that people have this allow to communicate with famous people in any where and any...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...ow to communicate with famous people in any where and any time. For example, last week I ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: HAVE_A_BREAKFAST[1]
Message: When we speak of types of meals, the article is not required: 'had lunch'.
Suggestion: had lunch
...y time. For example, last week I when I had a lunch with my friend at the resturant, we mee...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... angry from one person who want to take an photograph with him. Because the actor ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, well, for example, in addition, kind of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94199535963 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55091752368 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524361948956 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9924971928 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18797814761 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715599675893 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103744348018 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133464238412 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987972141652 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.