There is no denying to the fact that workers are more satisfied if they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than do similar tasks all day along, and without any doubt, it can increase workers happiness and the efficiency of companies as a whole. After all, it seems to me that there are many reasons which can support this fact and I am going to mention some of those most important points.
First and foremost, improving employees’ mental and psychological health. When people do one specific type of task everyday and they force to repeat it again and again, it creates similarity and depression during times. Human kinds naturally need variety and enjoy it. In the religion and philosophy view, gold provides different seasons and weathers to avoid similarity and bored. Therefore, people are required this variety in all aspects of their life, job is undeniably one of the most important part of the modern day human life, people spend most of their time in their work-place. Thus, if managers plan the work schedules in a way which can full in this mental requirement, so they will have healthier employees with more attention and interest to their tasks.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that it would be a good opportunity for workers to practice and learn more skills. When employees involve in multiple commissions, they should master some new skills to done their job. For example, in a business company if advertisers enroll to both outdoor and indoor activities, they not only must have high communication skill, but also they should be perfect in bureaucracy, research and creativity, in order to find new ways to attracts more costumers. However, if they manage to just focus on one specific portion, they simply limited to that small area and their potential intelligence in other fields never will have grown and even it will be faded after a while.
Finally, yet importantly, doing variety of tasks during a day will improve workers self-confidence and self-motivation. It is really important that workers believe themselves and realis that they are enough qualified around their tasks. It gives them the necessary stimulation and courage to looking for new methods and technics to do their job in the best way. In addition, self-confidence decrease their dependence to aids and help of supervisors which can improve employees’ happiness and the output of system as a whole.
On the basis of the reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when do similar tasks all day long. It is because people naturally need changes, and through this plan they would be able to master more skills, and because it can helpful in order to raising workers self-confidence and self-motivation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...workers are more satisfied if they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...hen people do one specific type of task everyday and they force to repeat it again and a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'repeating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: repeating
...ic type of task everyday and they force to repeat it again and again, it creates similari...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n is that it would be a good opportunity for workers to practice and learn more s...
^^
Line 8, column 118, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, really, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03131524008 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83248303631 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494780793319 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8646621788 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6111111111 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435713596863 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132975873291 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179050379572 0.0737576698707 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275362436594 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154499817836 0.0645574589148 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.