TPO 45
In this set of materails the reading passage discusses that several reason to critisize the possibility of that the chember structures that found in the Arizina are actually related to bee nest. While, in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and beleives that it is completely possible that this structure were related to bee nest, and the reasons that mentioned in the passage is not convencing.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the scientists could not find anty bee fossils that date to 200 million years ago. Thus, this stucture cannot related to bees. However, the professor claims that if we do not find bees fossils older that 200 million years ago, it is not means that the bees werre not present at this time. Because, the bees fossils could produced and preserve if this insects traped into the trees rezin sticky substance and this kind of tree were very rare in 200 million years ago.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that the flowering plants were not exist 200 million years ago. And in the absens of flowering plants the bees could not exist because they mainly nuritioned by flowering plants. She says that it is possible that the bees present before flowering plants because the a lot of early bees feed from non flowering plants and also the fren and pontriis.
Finally, in the text it is stated that there is lack on evidence that can supported that this structure are related to bees nest. because this sturture are without cap but the bees nest have it. The professor subscribs that the modern bees produced their nest using some waterproof materials and this matrials are present in this sturctures. Therefore, it is possible that this chamber were related to bees nest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...ails the reading passage discusses that several reason to critisize the possibility of that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...s time. Because, the bees fossils could produced and preserve if this insects traped int...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... fossils could produced and preserve if this insects traped into the trees rezin sti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...idea that the flowering plants were not exist 200 million years ago. And in the absen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...present before flowering plants because the a lot of early bees feed from non floweri...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...his structure are related to bees nest. because this sturture are without cap but the b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80781758958 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32927949731 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459283387622 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.778873306 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848244758562 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421502201629 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0170791069158 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564524134984 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169397772538 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.