TPO 45
In this set of materials, the reading passages discuss that the structures that find in Arizona are not acceptable as a evidence for the presence of bees in 200 million years ago and explained some reason for this claim. While the professor in the listening canst doubt in what is presented in the text and believes that the arguments that describe in the text are not convincing.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that because of we could not find fossils that remain from bees related to 200 million years ago it does not means that this insect can not present at this time. The insect's body preserves in the sticky materials like resin that produced by trees. And no fossil evidence can completely related to no presence of trees that producing this sticky material.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that absence of the flowering plant at 200 million years ago shows that the bee could not present at this time. She says that these bees can be nourished from other plants like franc or pantries. because in the early bees did not nourish just from flowering plants.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that the structures that find in Arizona have not any evidence that shows that this structure related to the bees and this nest can be produced by other insects like the beetle. the professr subscribes that we have evidence that shows that this structurs produced by bees. Some special chemicals waterproof substance present in this nest that very similar to the waterproof substance that produced by modern bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t find in Arizona are not acceptable as a evidence for the presence of bees in 20...
^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because we' instead.
Suggestion: because we
... the text, it is clearly mentioned that because of we could not find fossils that remain from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...ed to 200 million years ago it does not means that this insect can not present at thi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
.... And no fossil evidence can completely related to no presence of trees that producing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...om other plants like franc or pantries. because in the early bees did not nourish just ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...om other plants like franc or pantries. because in the early bees did not nourish just ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...duced by other insects like the beetle. the professr subscribes that we have eviden...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36476188345 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455555555556 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1413821046 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.818181818 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126451532627 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545744891707 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244840316271 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841318499536 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00804591228159 0.0443174109184 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.