A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
In the modern era, teachers have an important role in breeding educated humans because students pass a huge amount of their time at school. Therefore, the teachers’ characteristics, knowledge, and behaviors are highly essential. Regarding, some people believe that the way that lecturers communicate with students is more important than their level of knowledge. Personally, although I think both are vital for having an excellent educational system, having a creative teacher-student relation is nearly more required. To support my idea, I will be discussed it elaborately in the following.
First and foremost, a friendly relation between pupils and teachers improves the students’ performance because it motivates them. Actually, humans have emotion, and this emotion controls various aspects of their actions. For example, a pupil who is very delicate needs more attention from his teacher. The teacher should behave very kind and accurate with him because the shape of the companionship highly affects the student’s success in the lesson. Also, if teachers speak with students with suitable words and having smiles during the teaching, it can motivate students to work harder to achieve outstanding grades. I mean that although, the amount of the teacher’s knowledge is helpful, if the teacher does not establish an effective relation with the pupils, the teacher’s ability and skill in the field will not assist to teach concepts properly. It is due to the fact that the students can not pay attention to someone who is not interesting for them. So, the teacher should create a friendly relation in order to enhance pupils’ prosperity.
Another worthwhile factor that should be considered is that different children have different psychological characteristics. In other words, the teacher not only should break the ice to establish a firm relation with students, but also should be intelligent to find some personalized strategies, based on each student’s features, to create the relations. Nowadays, the novel education systems consider this factor and use numerous methods such as using artificial intelligence, data mining, computer aided designs and other techniques in order to help teachers in finding the best way for teaching. Moreover, the amount of the money that invested on this issue is many times more than the budget that allocated to hire the professional teachers with myriad years experiences in their fields. It shows how cohesive relation between students and teachers is valuable. The schools which consider various characteristics to tackle the issue have three times more successful (based on a survey which published at Science journal on 2020) graduated students who enroll to high-rank universities.
To recapitulate, although teachers’ knowledge and information in their field are necessary, to bring more productive students up, teachers not only should establish creative companionship, but also, they should apply personalized education, which can obtain by helping of computers and AI, to behave with each student effectively and personally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...etween pupils and teachers improves the students performance because it motivates them A...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...of the companionship highly affects the students success in the lesson Also if teachers ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... I mean that although the amount of the teachers knowledge is helpful if the teacher doe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... effective relation with the pupils the teachers ability and skill in the field will not...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1026, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in order to enhance pupils prosperity Another worthwhile factor that should be...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1072, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents who enroll to highrank universities To recapitulate although teachers knowle...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, i mean, i think, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40677966102 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84089235063 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497881355932 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 793.8 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 472.0 20.1344086022 2344% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2552.0 100.406767564 2542% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 472.0 20.6045352989 2291% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 128.0 5.45110844103 2348% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362114969998 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.362114969998 0.076458572812 474% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232412187497 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462794018235 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 240.1 11.7677419355 2040% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -416.06 58.1214874552 -716% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 188.6 10.1575268817 1857% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.58 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 31.1 8.01818996416 388% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.002688172 580% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 190.8 10.0537634409 1898% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 189.0 10.247311828 1844% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.