Teachers should have teaching skills in addition to their knowledge. Some people concur that excellent knowledge is the only principle requirement for a teacher. However, i disagree with this notion and argue that some abilities are more important than knowledge for two reasons and I will develop these ideas in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, as a nature of this job, teachers should communicate and convey information to students effectively. In my opinion, not having perfect knowledge is not a big deal. But teachers must have some soft skills in order to compensate for this gap. For example, my statistics professor did not know or sometimes forgot some important formulas about the subject. Moreover, he could not speak fluently in English. Nonetheless, he was able to communicate effectively and motivated me superbly. Although his vocabulary is limited, he can use fewer words with hand gestures and teach subject flawlessly. It is certainly clear to see why soft skills are more important.
Second of all, not every knowledgeable person is a teacher. In order to be a successful teacher, a person should possess some additional abilities. No one can deny that one of these abilities is excellently understanding students. According to experiments made by Australian scholars, if students favor their teacher, they try to study well that subject with the aim of getting appraise. Drawing from my own experience, I can say that if a teacher does not relate to and create relationships with his or her students well, he or she probably will not be admired by them. For instance, I was trying to avoid economics classes in university in spite of my fondness for this subject. There was only one reason: bad instructor. I do admit that she was very talented and knowledgeable; however, she was very strict and communicated rudely to students. Almost everyone in class hated her and joined class reluctantly. As a result, no one had learned anything from this adroit lecturer.
To make a long story short, for the two reasons outlined above, I am of the opinion that a teacher's ability to create links with students is more significant than his or her excellent expertise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ple requirement for a teacher. However, i disagree with this notion and argue tha...
^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ne can deny that one of these abilities is excellently understanding students. According to experiments made...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...lined above, I am of the opinion that a teachers ability to create links with students i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07479224377 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93247020908 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562326869806 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8074923928 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2727272727 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4090909091 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221323287924 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550769863454 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483685966994 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136346867211 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014392474664 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.