Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
do you agree or disagree?
The university and school as an academic center, the main responsibility of which is to prepare students for having both a successful profession and personal life. In fact, academic settings make students decide their path and reach a tertiary education. Not until education gets improve can the society progress. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether teachers should not focus on social and political views in the class. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that Teachers should bend over backward and make their efforts so as to help students enhance their knowledge and experiences. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
Vast majorities of students continue their education in order to rise up their knowledge and reach the pinnacle of their lives. These students are pillars of every given society and try hard to reach a higher education so, teachers should support them in achieving their goals. Generally speaking, it is incumbent upon teachers to patronize and guide students to concentrate on their study. If teachers do not support students and spend time on diffusing their political social views, students will not be able to stay focus on their education. Indeed, not only can spreading these kinds of views distract students but also can run students into a huge problem. As a vivid example, the data and statistics in our country have shown that teachers who make their personal views in the class made less progress than other teachers who focus on education. Also, the dropout rate among students might have the increase in this situation, which is not beneficial for the entire society. To elucidate more on this issue, teachers are paid for their performances and their efforts to help students increase their knowledge, so, they should try hard and put their efforts to support students to become self-sufficient individuals in near future.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that the best and knowledgeable teacher always try to manage the time of the class into two parts. One part teaching new materials and the other for answering the question of students and clarifying the materials. In this case, not only will teacher make students to keep their incentive and motivation continue their education but also will indirectly help students to enhance their social activities. Going into the depth, these kinds of teachers always take the control of class and does not allow students to disturb the class. In fact, they set specific punishment for unruly students since, in this way, they teach students how to behave and how to take the responsibility for their acts. However, make political and social view known in the class might help students to become aware of many things that happen around them. Indeed, the political situation has the profound impact on people's lives and might influence students. So, in order to confront with some trials and tribulation students should have knowledge in that realm to cope with critical situations.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 673, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nd over backward and make their efforts so as to help students enhance their knowledge a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, as to, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2696.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12547528517 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64821459175 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471482889734 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.0 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7815686292 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54166666667 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377955884583 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109828488168 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849978897687 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215412967848 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129760806999 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.