technology
Nowadays technology plays an avoidable role in our life. So, it is important to consider how technology influence children. Most of the people assert that technology has a positive effect on children, and others point out that it can affect children's creativity negatively. Personally, I believe that technology can stimulate creativity ability at children. I feel this way for two reasons which I explore them in the following essay.
First of all, children with today's technology can gain a broad vision in comparison with they could in the past. They can observe and follow available technology and take ideas from them to supplement their lacks or create more advanced one than it is now. My little brother's case is a compelling example of this. He is 10 years old, and has an electrical car toy. His problem with this toy was that it had not any light on it. My brother used his imagination and thought in order to solve this problem. He created an automatic light for his car toy so that when the nearby light is low its lamps began to light up.
Secondly, children can get their desired information easily with current technology. They can do this immediately just by a single search on the internet these days, hence, their time will be saved, and they can spend more time on throwing out their ideas from their mind and turning their imagination into reality. By asserting to my brother example, he utilized this method, and as it was mentioned he could do good work. This example clearly illustrates what I mean.
To sum it up, I strongly believe that technology can able to make children more creative than they were without it. This is because their imagination is escalated with technology, and by using technology, they have more time to be creative.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, i mean, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84590163934 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6344746851 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6179944876 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1111111111 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197677607328 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821629841396 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106613405616 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144064387685 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122940052869 0.0645574589148 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.