technology has made children less creative than they were in the past
In the last three decades, advanced technology has affected children's personalities drastically. Today young people could use computers in their schools and homes. From a personal perspective, cut-edged technology has made kids more creative given that it has a positive impact on their education and intelligence. Bellow, I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, technology has influenced young adults' intelligence in a positive way. Provided that students use the internet in their studying, they can come up with new ideas, which could help them in their projects. Furthermore, the internet could promote young adults' critical thinking and intelligible capacity. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is two years ago, my son had a science project. He used the internet to integrate information and find out new plans for his project. As a result, he came up with a creative opinion and got high grades.
On the other hand, without the internet, he might have a basic idea. Another example of using technology, my son usually plays a specific online game called Minecraft. In this game, he spends hours placing digital blocks to manufacture his masterpiece. Consequently, throughout technology, he could foster his creativity.
Next, coupled with intelligence, proper education is another virtue of technology. Provided that students use the internet, they can open the door to a wealth of information. Moreover, they could improve their fundamental knowledge about various subjects and accelerate their understanding. For instance, three years ago, my daughter was trying to learn alphabets since there are an abundance of apps that could be used to teach kindergarten kids how to write. I used them with her and they were so beneficial. In addition to that, a year ago, my son was struggling in math, so I downloaded a specific program that helped him in this subject. Therefore, he now does not have any problem with this subject. As a result, using technology makes learning more engaging.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, technology is very crucial not only for young people's intelligence, but also for their knowledge. It is suggested that advocates for education, in order to complete to expand and progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the last three decades, advanced tech...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my supporting points in more details. The first and foremost point, technology...
^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
... point, technology has influenced young adults intelligence in a positive way. Provide...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...as influenced young adults intelligence in a positive way. Provided that students use the interne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy, he could foster his creativity. Next, coupled with intelligence, proper ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hnology makes learning more engaging. Taking everything into consideration, wi...
^^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... suggested that advocates for education, in order to complete to expand and progr...
^^
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to complete to expand and progress.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26737967914 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9827015164 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.856421601 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0833333333 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5833333333 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110997282581 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031955984994 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456724419753 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600502086287 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468843680923 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.