television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Today there are ample channels in television with shows and most of these programs are sponsored by big companies therefore it is essential to broadcast their advertisements. However, it is not worthwhile to show a lot of advertisements that attract children. I believe that advertisements targeting small kids should not be permitted due to a couple of reasons.
Firstly, there are multiple companies selling similar products in the society for a variety of purposes. A child's mind can be easily toiled with funny and animated advertisements related to products. For instance, there are plenty of companies selling teddy bear toys and when a kid sees the different kinds and colors in them they are tempted to get them. Soon they will be crying to their parents to get them even if the child owns one. they do not recognise the value of money during that moment and a child always is attracted to new things. therefore, it is the parent’s responsibility to make sure that child is allowed less time to watch these advertisements.
Secondly, it will be an immense waste of time for these children to sit in front of the television. For instance, a child in the age of two to five year, at this very small age if seeing a lot of advertisements can cause addiction. they will be wasting their precious time instead of playing in the ground or listening to stories at their day care school. Likewise, reading habit at a very young age can help them to cultivate their imagination skills and enable them to be better students in their future schooling. any activities starting at a young age can be easily developed and enhanced either be reading or painting. Hence, it is essential that kids are not inclined to these advertisements.
Thirdly, instead of the advertisements any kind of education programs will be beneficial to them. For instance, watching animal planet channel gives them an insight to the wildlife and their species. Similarly, they gain more knowledge about the world instead of unnecessary advertisements which do not provide any information to them. For this reason, advertisements that are aimed to get the children's attention should not be allowed.
To conclude, the excessive advertisements are a waste of time and damaging to children. There should be some informative and useful knowledge imparted to kids at a young age rather than the business increasing advertising techniques by the companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...to get them even if the child owns one. they do not recognise the value of money dur...
^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...hild always is attracted to new things. therefore, it is the parent's responsibility...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... of advertisements can cause addiction. they will be wasting their precious time ins...
^^^^
Line 9, column 518, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Any
...ter students in their future schooling. any activities starting at a young age can ...
^^^
Line 9, column 665, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hence, it is essential that kids are not inclined to these advertisements. T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07673267327 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03689772133 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.117908529 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278785784995 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084527036267 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794783775899 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167417298872 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695494958813 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.