TPO42 integrated

Essay topics:

TPO42 integrated

The passage and the lecture both discuss about the methods to avoid injury to birds while travelling through glass windows of big buildings. The author states three ways to prevent this problem. The lecturer challenges all these claims made in the following way.

Firstly, the passage mentions that by replacing regular glass with one way glass birds would consider it as a solid barrier and will not hit it. However, the lecturer claims that the one way glass will reflect and as such it would reflect either a blue sky or a tree. This in turn can cause harm to the birds since it would consider the building as a tree or sky and hit it.

Secondly, using colourful designs like using thin stripes over the glass when seen by the birds will avoid it. The lecturer rebuts this point of the author by stating that birds will consider the space between the stripes as a hole and will come near the glass. But if the stripes are so close to each other there will be a difference which will also make the room darker.

Thirdly, the reading posits that by emitting magnetic field signals on the window the birds will be guided away from the building since many birds use magnetic field for navigation. The speaker refutes this point from the passage too. He elaborates that birds use the magnetic field based flying to travel long distances for instance to move from cold weather to warm weather conditions and not used for short distances.

To conclude, these are the ways by which lecturer casts doubts on the viewpoints made by the author.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tes three ways to prevent this problem. The lecturer challenges all these claims ma...
^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d consider the building as a tree or sky and hit it. Secondly, using colourf...
^^
Line 13, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly, the reading posits that by emitting magnetic field signals on the window the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73626373626 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17260278791 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531135531136 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6292455233 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4615384615 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41336225261 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140074469087 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103128056875 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195214592539 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987850970388 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.