People work for several reasons some work for leisure others for money. There are a variety of jobs available and people do choose it according to their interest and desires. I believe that doing different kinds of work a day makes a person more productive than monotonous work due to a couple of reasons.
Firstly, the human mind is created with variety of ideas it cannot always think in same way. Likewise, doing different sets of work same day will make our minds more engaging and happy. For instance, a person working in an office doing data entry all day along will get bored but if he is given filing , data entry and distribution work he will do it more efficiently. This is because the human mind cannot concentrate on a single work for a long time there will be a plethora of thoughts running in his brain. Hence, it will be better to do different variety of work than a single mode working.
Secondly, it would be an exercise to the brain when there are differences in the work types. For instance, in a rapid expanding industry like the technology firm the workers need be thinking in all ways not in a single way of thinking. Here, the employees need to be blooming with different ideas in their mind for their work to be successful. likewise, people who are enthusiastic and has an eagerness to learn will be interested in this kind of software work and more will survive in this industry and can go higher in their career. Therefore, an interested mind with a passion to work in a rapidly expanding and changing work will be more productive than monotonous job.
However, some kind of jobs require doing repetitive work all day. Unlike the other jobs this kind will provide a stable salary and safety for some. For example, government office work that involves plenty of typing. The employer works like a machine. Even though he might feel bored the expected salary would make him happy and satisfied.
To conclude, people choose their work according to their desire. Some people like to work in an environment of rapidly changing work requirements others like to do the same kind of job all day.
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.60
- TPO 09- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-ce90
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.66
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
...will get bored but if he is given filing , data entry and distribution work he wil...
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in a single way" with adverb for "single"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...orkers need be thinking in all ways not in a single way of thinking. Here, the employees need t...
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...r mind for their work to be successful. likewise, people who are enthusiastic and has an...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71657754011 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50438761643 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459893048128 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2676393485 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.