These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in school-related activities or sports. However, they should be given more time to do whatever they want.
Children, one of the disadvantaged groups, are supposed to be supervised all the time because they are lack of the ability to distinguish right from wrong. Thus, most parents tend to hold the idea that children should allocate more time to their school assignments, including coursework and activities related to school, instead of their preferences. From my perspective, this view is true.
To begin with, spending plenty of time on finishing homework can help children entrench what they have learnt from the daily class. There is no denying that the homework assigned by the teachers is usually to test how much the students have perceived, for example, how many formulas of maths or physics they have memorized. Once they can be up to this task, they may feel more confident in the next learning stage, ending up performing better in all the educational procedures, which are deliberately divided into several grades for them to experience. Meanwhile, if they bump up against difficulty in accomplishing their assignments, they may have more time to rescue this situation through several effective measures, such as reviewing the notes they have taken, or asking their friends, parents, or even their teachers for help. Under this circumstance, chances are that they may not lag behind in their teachers’ teaching syllabus.
Let us imagine that students devote themselves to the pursuit of what they want after school. Not only can they fail to summarize how much they have obtained from the teachers, which can be harmful to their learning,but also they may forget what they actually have mastered in class while they are developing their interest after they finish their daily schooling.
Besides, children are more likely to be misled by their favorite after-class activities. According to psychologists, children aged 3 to 18 lack the ability to tell right from wrong and also are vulnerable to adverse influences. If they are allowed to decide what they should do on their own, it is possible that they are prone to behaving badly. For example, modern children are addicted to online games, where there are full of violent and pornographic contents. If they are not controlled by the school-oriented games in their spare time, it is likely that they may commit crimes after being exposed to this unhealthy information. Plenty of juvenile delinquencies arise in this way recently.
To conclude, as children cannot understand clearly what they are doing, they are not permitted to do the things they want in their leisure time. Even if they can cultivate their interests in their spare time through their favorites, they should be under their custodians’ supervision—under the control of their teachers.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-11 | Vanessazyq | 70 | view |
2018-11-10 | Frank Chen | 81 | view |
2018-10-12 | iambach | 70 | view |
2016-12-21 | Yanyan Liu | 93 | view |
- Parents should not express their disagreements to the teacher if parents find the teaching method incorrect. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
..., which can be harmful to their learning,but also they may forget what they actually...
^^^^
Line 4, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...likely that they may commit crimes after being exposed to this unhealthy informat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20681818182 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88523510508 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520454545455 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0710446726 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.277777778 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336379102603 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121606601347 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811373579654 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223082055405 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281039589078 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.