Throughout the world's oceans, hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants, coral and sponges can attach: and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish. Recently, workers in the fishing industry have tried to increase the amount of suitable habitat for fish by constructing artificial reefs from old metal objects and industrial materials and placing them in coastal waters. Artificial reefs have several benefits.
Both the article and lecture discuss about artificial reefs. The passage mentions that artificial reefs make from old metal objects and industrial materials, and putting them in coastal waters has several benefits. However, the professor refutes these ideas and states that these reefs have more problems than benefits.
First, the reading passage claims that artificial reefs can increase the populations of some species of fish. On the contrary, the professor explains that artificial reefs attract fish species to a single location. Even from long distances, fishes come to this single location, decreasing their populations because fishers can easily find this location and capture all of them. So this place has a negative effect on their populations.
Second, the article mentions that the small-scale fishers can have their own private reefs in secret locations, which is beneficial for them. However, the professor states that this is a bad idea. Because not known locations can cause safety problems. When these reefs are secret, they might cause crashing boats and ships because fishers use the large net, and in shallow water, reefs make their work difficult. Also, when the reefs are known to others, it will not have any benefit for local fishers.
Finally, the reading mentions that artificial reefs are a good way to recycle materials no longer needed for other purposes. in contrast, the lecturer states that creating artificial reefs from old tiers can cause serious problems. Professor claims that the chemicals used in tires are hazardous, and most of them are made from chemical materials such as Azbon. When storms come, it destroy and crashes these materials. Azbon has a negative impact on seawater, and it damages the environment. These materials are harmful to fishes and other marine animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ofessor states that this is a bad idea. Because not known locations can cause safety pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ls no longer needed for other purposes. in contrast, the lecturer states that crea...
^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destroys'?
Suggestion: destroys
...als such as Azbon. When storms come, it destroy and crashes these materials. Azbon has ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 52.1666666667 42% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31141868512 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46268593629 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546712802768 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.493538538 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2777777778 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132918928396 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437255568225 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343976462123 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838036703362 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235648147822 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.