In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce their spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that economy has played an important role in people’s life in each society. Sometimes, societies face with inflation and economic problem which the government should optimize the expense of money in various areas to deal with its damages. Not all people concur when this issue arises. To being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that governments could decline the devoted budget in Arts for compensating its lacks in financial projects in the country rather than scientific areas and something related to people’s entertainment. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, importance of these areas specifically in people’s lifestyle could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the valuable ideas proposed by scientist in solving different problem in the human society, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that countries in myriad period of times have coped with their problems by helping elites of that societies. Their effort in solving problems in each area could not ignore, and they are vital for stimulating humankind to work hard for acquiring its goals. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate economic students unveiled the fact that in the recent European economic crisis, about 85 active research teams worked on the causes and solution of this phenomenon, and their success was substantial for dealing with inflation in about 9 months. This example shows the significance of scientific research in society.
In addition to the reason raised above, satisfying people in difficult situations for solving problems in peace and serenity could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, in the modern world with its galloping pace, people should endure the high pressure of work and complex life. Thus, governments could provide an appropriate condition for them to release stresses and being relaxed and unwind. To delineate, they should provide many facilities such as parks and garden for people leisure times. Thus, in this condition, governments could plan for solving economic problems in peace and without any public opposition. In addition, governments spend a lot of money for the gardens and parks before and its maintenance is reasonable. For instance, in the last Iran's economic crises, the government gives many days vacation to its worker and officers for reducing costs and solve the inflation problem.
Drawing upon the reason, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that governments should optimize the expense of money in unimportant and unnecessary areas such as Arts in critical situations for solving its problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the valuable ideas proposed by scientist in solving different problem in the huma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2626.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33739837398 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91312566559 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 816.3 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.0316385974 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.888888889 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221098364396 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067647607354 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435333392872 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126032387941 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163199003755 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 86.8835125448 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.