Today , many people continue to do a part-time job after being retired, sometimes in the same place and sometimes for another organisation.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It seems that some organizations keep their employee after retirement to do some part-time jobs. In less developed countries are proved that the majority of individuals in the retirement age have more experiences than other people who work in organizations. Besides, this stream exerted significant advantages from economic and human resources aspects for organizations and people. However, it has a disadvantage for a part of educated people after graduating from university. This essay attends to examine clearly the advantages and disadvantages of this issue.
In the first step, gray people or elderly people are an essential source for organizations from human resources. By way of explanation, authorizes have more concentration on people who have experiences on the technical job and give them some positions to manage a unit of organizations. Furthermore, it is an excellent opportunity for one after retirement to advises fresh people. In the Iranian bank, for example, it is a custom to use this kind of people for sensitive job positions like a person who controls the supply of the money and train new employees in the organization. Besides, if these people can handle all problems in banks, it can help and grow the economic condition. From a financial perspective, one of the advantages is that it can make a context for the gray people to have the chance to earn money after retirement. Although this not enough source of capital for living, the massive amount of money, which is considered by the organization for them, can be allocated for insurance and some social services. To sum up, using older adults for helping organizations can be defined as a tremendous successful factor for companies.
Additionally, one of the disadvantages is that there no space for educated people after finishing their studies in the future. Especially for the higher education level of the student in universities should establish a plan to use newly updated experts in the high-tech job. Also, the updated knowledge has been grown by the university to guide students directly to find their careers after graduation. Nonetheless, because of background knowledge, the office work is focused on the student to struggle to find a typical job rather than working as a manager to advise employees. It is necessary to consider that, and the organization should trust, invest, and allocate a platform to hire young people in the universities. In the US, for instance, the MBA universities or business schools have a strong relationship with some companies like Adidas, Nike, or Apple to train students in the preparatory courses. This fact can help the economic condition in every society. Consequently, this disadvantage can be converted to the benefit of the student after graduation.
In conclusion, the people who are retiring after their job should be useful for societies and sometimes, they can play an essential role in helping the fresh people in the companies, and they have additional income for their life. However, it can be beneficial to hire the best and intelligent students in the companies for a sensitive job and high-tech position.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2648.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2125984252 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07792697237 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482283464567 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 860.4 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5773131391 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.130434783 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0869565217 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04347826087 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260944449205 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851389155175 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497203609601 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180904536004 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529984261138 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.