Respective expertise explained that "in the last race of cars, the Ferrari won the competition because its car was perfect". We notice that mistakes have consequences, and it brings about embracing. In my perspective, humans should work perfectly even though it takes more time. There are reasons, and I enjoy exploring a good portion of them.
As a priority, mistakes get time and money. It deteriorates in our economic and status. When people have a mistake and flaw in their doing, they must come back, prepare it again, and then carry on. In some situations, they should give back some steps. For example, if a student has flawed points in his writing, he has to review it serval times. In addition, if people have faulted in their works, they should compensate. However, they sometimes could not offset events. When a researcher injects a Nano-drug, if it has mistaken, the patient died. Thus, he should not only pay money but also compensate for his process. So, mistakes take more time and money.
Moreover, perfect working causes people to believe you and your doing. Therefore, it makes you become fame and renown in his conducting. For example, a company has a part called review products. They look at the preparation to remain and curb fore consequences. If it has mistaken, the firm gets notorious. Also, since thinking you are excellent in his work, people buy your production, and it creates profits. Following a case illustrates this point. Individuals know Sony, and it has respected. When they believe that Sony is a splendid mark, they purchase innovations. Hence, it makes lucrative.
On the other hand, if you do not have time for doing perfectly, you enforce to carry out. So, it causes you to have problems. You should care about the issue and take experiences, which is so essential for your upcoming job or work. However, I think it is not a great work, and people should spend time on a good job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...orking causes people to believe you and your doing. Therefore, it makes you become f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, i think, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87272727273 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69928399172 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3897175073 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.4285714286 100.406767564 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7857142857 20.6045352989 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121599093706 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321946357883 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424741960466 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774898310027 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304612598313 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.