Based on facts, human beings are not predictable, because many factors have major impacts on their decisions. The decision about making new friends is no exception. There is a controversy among different people about whether it is better to keep and cement old friendships or strike up new friendships with people. Although people can prove loyalty, by keeping in touch with old friends, it is a fact that the society always changes our friends and offers new ones. Thus, all people had better adapt themselves to the status quo offered by society to avoid being alone. Lines below shed more light on the issue put forward.
The first and foremost merit of making new friends is that, in this way, we will be able to find new friends under new conditions and groups. It is not a case that all of people around us, always stay with us. As a case in point, students in a class may change their school or neighbors may move to new apartments, thus people ought to recognize new neighbors and strike up friendships with them instead of traveling a long distance to see an old neighbor! As a result, making new friends is essential for all people to adapt to the status quo – new neighbors, new roommates, new colleagues, etc. - that society offers these to them or imposes these on them.
In addition, all people should have new experience with new friends because they open doors to friendship which help us to know old friends well, by comparing the old and new ones, recognizing positive and negative aspects of their behavior, and making a fair judgement about them. By this effective means, a person can separate the wheat from the chaff and understand to cement a friendship or spoil it. It, also, helps us to learn new positive aspects of personality from different people. For instance, if a new friend is a very responsible man, you will practice responsibility, too, and it, also, can be useful for old friends because you will be more responsible for them.
Last but not least, people can take advantages of new people. On no account is it right that an old friend has not all abilities and cannot be helpful to resolve all problems. For example, in a class, some students are good in mathematics, some in physics, etc. and you can go to them and ask them for a favor in case you have some difficulties with math or physics. As a result, the more friends you have, the more chances for being solved your problems. On the other hand, if a person starts a new friendship, he or she will be able to help more people. People would agree that their abilities are not for just old friends and special people. They wish they helped as many people as they were able.
In conclusion, by taking all into consideration, it can be wholeheartedly alleged that because society separates people from each other and creates new groups, it is important for us to practice with making new friends as many as possible. In this way, all learn to adapt themselves to the society and have comparison between new and old friends, as well as gather many useful friends. Perhaps, by leaving old friends and finding new ones, individuals could learn the concept of ‘’losing’’, which is a principle underlying all relationships.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2671.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 565.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72743362832 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82421973003 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444247787611 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1730108263 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.84 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0641253866638 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267445806723 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323253537631 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0446626270171 0.150856017488 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123435427631 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.