The life of the people is changing tremendously. Nowadays people are spending more money on personal enjoyment,luxurious items,expensive cars and bikes. But on the other side, the competition is increasing day by day. Things are costlier than before. So people have started saving money for future and started working hard. I strongly agree that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. There are many reasons.
Goverments are focusing on developing better public transport facilities. In India, metro train project is going in many cities. The Prime Minister of India has also decided to run bullet train between two cities Mumbai and Delhi. Public transport is more cheaper and safe. In metro trains, you can travel many kilometers in 10 minutes. Using personal car it is not possible. People are working hard to earn more money because competition is increasing day by day. Because of a technology we have to compete with the world. Traffic problems and pollution are also increasing. People are changing their perspective and started travelling by public transport. Consider the case of mine, during college days I used to travel by my personal car but now I travel by public transport. People have started realizing the benefits of the public transport. Goverments encourage people to use public transport to reduce pollution.
On the other side, people use to prefer travel by cars because they don't have to wait for bus or trains. Salaries of people are also increasing. So they prefer to buy expensive cars and bikes. We can also buy car in budget of 1-2 lakhs which is possible for a person who ears around 20,000 rupees per month. To have a own car is always dream of people. Due to competition in future we can get better cars in lower rate.
To conclude, there will fewer cars in the future because public transport facilities will be best. People will realize the import of public transport and they understand that pollution will be less if we travel public transport. Better and better technologies will be used for public transport by goverment to increase use of it and reduce difficulties face by public .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The life of the people is changing treme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Nowadays people are spending more money on personal enjoyment,luxurious items,ex...
^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , luxurious
...ending more money on personal enjoyment,luxurious items,expensive cars and bikes. But on ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , expensive
...y on personal enjoyment,luxurious items,expensive cars and bikes. But on the other side, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere are today. There are many reasons. Goverments are focusing on developing be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rments are focusing on developing better public transport facilities. In India, m...
^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...s Mumbai and Delhi. Public transport is more cheaper and safe. In metro trains, you can trav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 486, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e competition is increasing day by day. Because of a technology we have to compete with...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...public transport to reduce pollution. On the other side, people use to prefer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... On the other side, people use to prefer travel by cars because they d...
^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e to prefer travel by cars because they dont have to wait for bus or trains. Salarie...
^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...around 20,000 rupees per month. To have a own car is always dream of people. Due ...
^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dreamed', 'dreamt'.
Suggestion: dreamed; dreamt
... per month. To have a own car is always dream of people. Due to competition in future...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we can get better cars in lower rate. To conclude, there will fewer cars in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t and reduce difficulties face by public .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93663911846 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70775452155 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471074380165 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2191755865 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.7931034483 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5172413793 20.6045352989 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.586206896552 5.45110844103 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.5376344086 271% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88709677419 348% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135251293226 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437603157541 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816069335614 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101340090802 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484608194204 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.48 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.