In the passage, there are several arguments made against the powered flight of Pterosaurs. But, the lecturer provides some evidence which proves these arguments false.
In the beginning, the passage claims that the Pterosaurs are cold blooded animals. Cold blooded animals typically have a slow metabolism and are unable to produce a lot of energy. The lecturer refuses this and argues that the Pterosaurs have a dense hair-like covering which indicates that they were warm-blooded. The hair-like covering is mainly for maintaining high blood body temperature in a colder atmosphere.
Next, the passage states that the Pterosaurs were as large as a giraffe were probably so heavy they would not have been able to flap their wings fast enough to stay aloft for any length of time. But, the lecturer says that the Pterosaurs had aeronautical features. Their bones were hollow so that weight would be low. So, they would be able to fly.
Finally, from fozziled bones that Pterosaurs had too small legs and weak to allow them to run fast and jump high enough to launch themselves into the air. On the contrary, the lecturer opines that birds only use two legs for jump high but Pterosaurs uses four legs which allow them to run fast and jump higher.
To conclude, according to the passage Pterosaurs would be able to fly because of their body structure and weight. But, the lecturer provides facts that show that they would able to fly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the passage, there are several argume...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be low. So, they would be able to fly. Finally, from fozziled bones that Pteros...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llow them to run fast and jump higher. To conclude, according to the passage Pt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94650205761 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45413826591 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1284862536 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8571428571 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 7.06452816374 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529696373546 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163760909682 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104448638842 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242083528048 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106918436242 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.