In today's modern and complex world, and in any society, any person's social and political attitude has a substantial effect on improvement and discipline of their societies. Schools are a significant place to formation future personality of children in which any person spends their milestone of their life. Therefore, teachers play a pivotal role in shaping children behavior and personality. Students has to be instructed not only the academic lessons such as chemistry and math, but the social and political issues as well. There is debate that teachers should make their social and political opinions aware to students. As far as I am concerned, the advantage of talking about teacher's viewpoints basically outweighs those of the not mentioning that. The reasons for my opinion are as follows.
Firstly, I subscribe to making a free situation based on thinking in the class should be beneficial.
Teachers, by talking about their social and political viewpoints, could give an opportunity to students to know, to think, and to discuss. But, teachers have to be circumspect and meticulous so that tension and confliction would not be made in the class between discussion, and student learn how peacefully discuss and exchange their opinions in friendly space.
Secondly, this situation causes to students read some books, listen to the news and search in internet to gain information and then bringing up their information in the class. In other words, these social and political issue would be important for students and they tend to know more. Because there are a wide range of information sources, some of them publish untrue data, teachers have to be careful about the source of information which chosen by students. In this regard, there is a Persian proverb about significance of the source of information, the equivalent of which in English may sound like this,'' before make an idea, be careful about person who are giving you information''. In this condition teachers should train to student how they have to choose the best source of news, information and data.
Finally, I believe that these political and social discussions and training, by fostering thoughtful and strong social characters, would make good results and privilege in society. I, personally, have an experience. When I was fifteen years old, my teacher spoke about some children who had to work and were not permitted to going to school. This matter has effected on me and my friends and it has being our concern. Because of this, now, we are helping them in financial and educational way. I, as well as two of my friends, am having collaboration with the big charity labor child as a teacher and collecting benefactors' donation, around us, to giving them to that charity.
All in all, I put the merits of the issue that teacher speak about their social and political points in the class before demerit of it. Since, students would know about social and political matter and this will able to make better social.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...l way. I, as well as two of my friends, am having collaboration with the big chari...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, such as, talking about, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05050505051 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7394088376 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513131313131 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6758490727 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.695652174 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19342968448 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619337561652 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494694114367 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10991943178 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386237581997 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.