The passage and the lecturer both discuss about a controversial painting, attributed to Rembrandt who is the most famous painter. The question is ''were the painting actually painted by Rembrandt or not?'' The reading provides three reasons to clarify the painter of this painting was not Rembrandt, suggesting that the main reasons are follows: The contradicting in woman's dressing in the painting, not fitting in light and shadow, and differing between this painting panel and Rembrandt's panel. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on this claim by bringing up reasons to reject the specific point made in the reading.
First, according to the passage, the servant-cap which woman is wearing in the portrait is not alignment by expensive fur collar. It is impossible that this error made by Rembrandt who had a lot attention in detail. In contrast, the lecturer maintain that fur collar is not a part of original painting. Moreover, the evidences and the results of X-Ray analysis can explain the fact that someone has painted that top of the original painting in order to increase a value of portrait after it was made.
Second, the reading points out that dark collar do not reflect the light, but the face of woman is shine because of reflection of light and this is an obvious mistake which can not be attributed to this artist. Nonetheless, The lecturer highlights the fact that woman was wearing a piece of light cloth and the light reflection was suitable.
Third, the reading says that Rembrandt often painted on a single wood panel. Despite this, this painting is on the panel, made by sticking several pieces of wood. The listening, nevertheless, contends that the original painting is on the panel that is similar to the other masterpieces of Rembrandt. But the other pieces were added consequently to make it ground and valuable.
All in all the listening proves this painting belongs to Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: IS_WERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where'?
Suggestion: where
...he most famous painter. The question is were the painting actually painted by Rembra...
^^^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...he most famous painter. The question is were the painting actually painted by Rembra...
^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g actually painted by Rembrandt or not? The reading provides three reasons to clari...
^^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is painting panel and Rembrandts panel. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on this ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00943396226 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70506244691 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496855345912 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8932034157 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516730199091 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177101282869 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104905014383 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276272696963 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699133319217 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.