TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Teachers are a great influence on students overall because they are the in charge of transmitting one of the most important things in life, knowledge. As far as I am concerned, teachers should be neutral in class because if they make the students know what are his political or social views, students will not know what is the other side of the coin, so it is indispensable that professors do not take any side in the classroom. I cling to this outlook because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, when the professor is unbiased, students are able to analyze and criticize what is the truth according to their own view. Besides, students need to have lots of knowledge from both sides in order to form a good opinion in their minds. To clarify my point, let me take myself as an example, my teacher once told me that although he was liberal, he was aware of the problems that liberalism had caused in our country. I was impressed how a liberal individual was proud of his political party, but at the same time analytic with some liberalists who had committed errors. Ever since I realized that the political party’s ideas are much more different than how some politicians translate these ideas into real life. So, I am glad now with my professor for the way he showed me the reality.

Secondly, when it comes to finding what is the actual purpose of the politics, it is really difficult because every country in the world has undergone political crises which have left poverty, corruption, abused population, and so forth. Therefore, students as future ambassadors of the world need to be told by their professors the consequences of bounding strongly to a political side in order to make them more reflexive about the political measure and not to stay like domed animals. For instance, I have reached a conclusion in my mind about political with just one question: What would happen if there would be no politicians? I think that the world would be better without people trying to lie that they are governing us, while they are robbing us how did I reach to have this mindset? Because my teacher once told me that we should never be the prey of anyone because nobody can tell us what we need to do or manipulate us with some insignificant bribes.

To sum up, I strongly believe that professor should focus on explaining the topics their students without taking any political or social side. Thus, they will nurture better humans which will be prepared to fight for what they have, their knowledge.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ty's ideas are much more different than how some politicians translate these id...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71205357143 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60980077181 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529017857143 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7685651078 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9375 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171470158309 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057532023355 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414612424423 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110447400206 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233254620338 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.