The reading and the lecture discuss the smart cars which come with technological advantages such as computer and sensors, which will provide precise information about the car’s location. The author believes that smart cars would be safer, quicker, and cheaper. The professor bring into question the claims made in the article, she considers that there are no clear benefits in the author’s points.
First, the author comes up with the idea that Intelligent cars will save lives by preventing accidents becuase of their internal sensors, these sensors could detect obstacles in their path in order to make the car driver or car system to avoid them. However, the professor argues that these cars will still get into accidents, since even the most well-equiped cars fail ocacionally, besides, the tighly packed and pile lops of these cars may fail and leave large numbers of accidents. Therefore, these cars will not reduce the death rate.
Second, the author states that traffic problems will stop with these new smart cars because they will be more close to each other, moreover, commuting time will be reduced because of the high speed of these cars. The professor rebuts this argument by pointing out that more people may decide to drive due to driving conviniences, which as a result might increase the communting time because of the massive number of cars in streets.
Finally, the author contends that driving costs will decrease due to the fact that smart cars are designed to go toward their destination in a more direct way. Furthermore, he says that the car’s repairments will be much cheaper than today cars because smart cars’ parts will last more time. THe professor, on the other hand, posits that these kind of cars will be actually more expensive because the sensors –behind cars measurements- may be much more expensive to repair. So tradicional cars may be cheaper than smart cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s would be safer, quicker, and cheaper. The professor bring into question the claim...
^^^
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... made in the article, she considers that there are no clear benefits in the autho...
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ofessor, on the other hand, posits that these kind of cars will be actually more expensive...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, well, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11392405063 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51355084104 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2337506278 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06452816374 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296269823561 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124131454696 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615788524981 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189028507328 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251825387871 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.