The most sort after quality is the productivity, the rate at which people can work efficiently with minimum mistakes. Companies thrive on innovation and productivity. I believe today's world is changing fast and to sustain the competition people are forced to be quick and accept any risk associated with it. That being said, I think, people should take calculated risks. I will explore the first option with supporting arguments in my essay.
First, to beat the growing competition companies introduce new and innovative products. If companies do not act fast enough on their plan, then they may lose the edge over the competitors. Everyday markets are flooded with new products and to sustain the changing demands, companies need to be quick and accept risk associated with it. For example, there are numerous mobile companies in the market. If any company choose to work slowly and with minimum mistakes, then their product will be of great quality but will be launched late in the product race and company will lose their share of the market. Companies follow the product cycle and even if the product has any defect, it is usually resolved in the next product cycle with introduction of new features to continue to hook on current customers and attract new ones.
Next, in general people do not like to wait. With the rapid increase in population the competition is becoming severe for jobs, usually it starts well before kids graduate from colleges. If a student is slow and want to make sure before deciding on a job or a class to take, there are thousands waiting to take his or her spot and move up the ladder.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that working quickly with enough consideration of risks is key for survival in the ever changing technologically and economically 21st century.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95065789474 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6890577203 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555921052632 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7012085993 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131155621943 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041582694453 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370476559052 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854967290916 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199762450299 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.