Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
A group of people who think that today young people do not allocate enough time to help their communities suggest that time is a major factor which inhibits young people to help the community. In fact, today, due to the severe competition, which is a result of resource scarcity and economic crisis, young people have to optimize their time and prioritize activities based on their importance and possible outcomes. Therefore, they do not have extra time to allocate to other activities such as social activities. For example, a young student has to study at the university and get a part-time job, in order to be able to afford his tuition fees. As statistics show, today, young people have less extra time compared to those who lived in the past.
In addition, due to the lack of knowledge on the importance of society and the devastating impact of human on the community, neither have young people the belonging sense to the community, nor they attempt to help the community in any way. They prefer to spend their leisure time on attractive entertaining activities, which have especially become available by the advance of the technology and emerge of computer devices, rather than on activities to support the community. In other words, they prefer themselves over the community in which they live.
On the other hand, some people subscribe to the view that even today, young people help the community throughout over different stages of their life, in terms of indirect supportive activities. Consider a student who voluntarily helps charities by selling hand-made products or holding music concerts and at the same time teaches a group of poor students, who cannot afford to pay for their classes. Both of the abovementioned activities fall into the category of activities to support the community.
In conclusion, I strongly assert that today young people spend less time and energy to help their community through supportive activities. Although some people attend supportive activities, the number of these cases are too low.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14450867052 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74495883837 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5515554381 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252727357263 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115083205632 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123360930114 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209225672609 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15301661123 0.0645574589148 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.