TPO 27
Despite the fact that giving some definite ideas about this issue without considering the situation about which we are talking is a bit difficult, and it fully depends on the conditions, I generally argue specification of the university's budget solely to professors' salaries for the sake of the improvement in the quality of education would not satisfy this purpose. This essay will elaborate upon the reasons of the disagreement with this plan.
To begin with, let's have a close look to the fundamental factors affecting on the quality of education. Regarding the factors determining the rank of universities in some ranking systems such as Times or Shanghai, we will find only professors are not decisive in the quality of education, comparing some other features such as students knowledge, educational facilities, recreational equipments, university space, and the number of published articles recognize the rank of universities all over the world. Although professors play a significant role in some of them like students knowledge or the number of published articles, they are not the only part. Take for instance, the university hiring a top distinguished professor in experimental optic physics by paying a great deal of money, but what if this very university has not enough lab facilities not only for the professor's experiments but also for his or her students. The outcome would be a high paid professor sitting in his or her office without any published articles, and the lack of suitable university education for students. Therefore, in this regard spending money only for students would not serve this purpose.
In addition, from my own experiences with studying as M.Sc. students, I discovered that for most of professors and scholars the last cause of happiness or the last reason of them to improve their job is money. Enjoying from a two years scientific experiment which may seem the most tedious job for a lot of people, the professors would take it more desirable to have a sophisticated, for example, mirror in their laboratory to examine their theories and to observe its results with their eyes. Thus, there are a lot of much more profound motivations stirring them to increase their efficiency and as a result the quality of education in an especial university.
In conclusion, with all of this taken into account, the plan proposing that the progress of education in a university would happen after increasing the professors' salaries deserve to fail since it does not consider all important vital components of a high qualified university providing high caliber education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...a significant role in some of them like students knowledge or the number of published ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from my own experiences with studying as M.Sc. students, I discovered that for mo...
^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sc
... my own experiences with studying as M.Sc. students, I discovered that for most o...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the professors') or simply say ''most professors''.
Suggestion: most of the professors; most professors
... M.Sc. students, I discovered that for most of professors and scholars the last cause of happines...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256578947368 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.116228070175 0.158761421928 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0877192982456 0.0866891130778 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0438596491228 0.046263068375 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0482456140351 0.0685040099705 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.160087719298 0.118717715034 135% => OK
Participles: 0.0394736842105 0.0351676179071 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97616267157 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0197368421053 0.0309702414327 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.133771929825 0.0887237588012 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0175438596491 0.0209618222197 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00657894736842 0.0139019557991 47% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2612.0 2387.08602151 109% => OK
No of words: 421.0 408.028673835 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20427553444 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358669833729 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315914489311 0.251872472559 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.254156769596 0.174417080927 146% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192399049881 0.112833075102 171% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97616267157 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534441805226 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 61.2502123809 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6684587814 63% => OK
Sentence length: 32.3846153846 20.5533526081 158% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.814852252 48.84282405 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.923076923 120.699889404 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3846153846 20.5533526081 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.23076923077 0.644075263715 191% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 63.9760643157 45.7405998639 140% => OK
Elegance: 2.18947368421 1.45489161554 150% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.158682790575 0.103427244359 153% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0917623450216 0.0752933317313 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.623011583841 0.497263757937 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.212914820832 0.151897553556 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.406602931612 0.336927656856 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0925451669005 0.067059652881 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.6433691756 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.