In the today's media era, every single person should be exactly familiar with the way according to which reporters and the media, on the whole, work. While quite a few people usually trust and follow only one source for finding out news, I personally believe that one source broadcasting news based on a defined set of policies is neither enough nor reliable. The reasons for my opinion will be elaborated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, everyone has this experience in their lives that different people describe the same story or event distinctively because each person has his or her own especial look to the world. In comparison between an artist and a philosopher, for example, if they explained the theme of Caligula, a play by Albert Camus, the artist would bring up its aesthetical views and may find it a pleasant play while the philosopher would arise the philosophy of life and the Camus' viewpoint about death. Due to this undoubted fact, trusting to a person or a specific source would only inform the audiences of one perspective of an event, while in the complicated modern's life, every news and happening has a great number of facets worth to follow.
Additionally, as in a brief way mentioned in the introduction, every news agency and channel pursue some especial policies based on which they has been shaped. Some have even an owner, and it means they should follow their owner's desires. Therefore, it would not an exaggeration if we told that every source broadcasts an event in a biased way, and there is approximately no objective news channel nowadays. Take Wikileaks, many are of the opinion that it is nonprofit, unbiased, and indifferent in broadcasting news, some other, on the other hand, believe that why it has not published any documents of Russia or China, why only the United States. In other words, if we were interested in the whole story of an event, we should follow most of the biased news agencies, then with our deduction ability, complete the event's puzzle to reach to the very truth of an event.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, not only is not there just a window to an event, but those windows are not apathetic as well. Seeking to discover the truth, people should consider various views to obtain all facts about an issue and to establish the truth connected to the reality based on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... her own especial look to the world. In comparison between an artist and a philosopher, fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'moderns'' or 'modern's'?
Suggestion: moderns'; modern's
...e of an event, while in the complicated moderns life, every news and happening has a gr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a brief way" with adverb for "brief"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ets worth to follow. Additionally, as in a brief way mentioned in the introduction, every ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...e especial policies based on which they has been shaped. Some have even an owner, a...
^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a biased way" with adverb for "biased"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d that every source broadcasts an event in a biased way, and there is approximately no objectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in other words', 'on the whole', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233995584989 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.130242825607 0.158761421928 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0728476821192 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0529801324503 0.046263068375 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0441501103753 0.0685040099705 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116997792494 0.118717715034 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0397350993377 0.0351676179071 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62323039527 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0286975717439 0.0309702414327 93% => OK
Particles: 0.00441501103753 0.00188951952338 234% => OK
Determiners: 0.136865342163 0.0887237588012 154% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0220750551876 0.0209618222197 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00883002207506 0.0139019557991 64% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2367.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 408.0 408.028673835 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80147058824 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335784313725 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.210784313725 0.251872472559 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156862745098 0.174417080927 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115196078431 0.112833075102 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62323039527 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 63.2216195307 59.2087087015 107% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6684587814 63% => OK
Sentence length: 31.3846153846 20.5533526081 153% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9299088443 48.84282405 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.076923077 120.699889404 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3846153846 20.5533526081 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 0.644075263715 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 52.4630467572 45.7405998639 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.71844660194 1.45489161554 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219731355883 0.300154397459 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102634241077 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0538339908999 0.0752933317313 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.56634687759 0.497263757937 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112126186418 0.151897553556 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924194143418 0.114077575197 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485455537944 0.0781384742642 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.373856079221 0.336927656856 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.065278240986 0.067059652881 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155696151254 0.210909579961 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311394197759 0.0618886996521 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.