TPO 29 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People show different attitudes towards on whether the education quality is improved if universities increase salaries for lecturers. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this argument. I give my vote to other three reasons which will be explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, academic quality will be increased when admission criteria are consolidated as it will guarantee learning capability of students. With higher enrolment standards, universities are able to select students with sufficient intelligence. As the result, those students can absorb knowledge better at school. My own experience is a compelling example. When I was a freshman student 10 years ago, the minimum required GPA of my university was only 3.0. Therefore, many students with low academic capabilities were admitted and they failed many class or could not finish the degree. When my university increased the minimum admitted grade to 3.5 a few years later, the quality of students was better off and consequently the education quality.
Secondly, universities should dig deep into their pockets to improve teaching facilities such as libraries, laboratories, computer labs so that students gain knowledge and understanding more easily. Modern tools and equipment facilitate the learning process of students especially in complicated subjects like computer science, chemical engineering. For example, my brother´s collegue has spent millions of dollars in the last five years to install state-of-the-art computer labs and the quality of graduating students has been extensively ascended.
Last but not least, universities should spend more money on financial aids or scholarships for their students. Those kinds of support urge students to focus their time and energy on learning which ,in turn, boosts the education quality. My cousin experience exemplifies this idea. His university provides valuable scholarships for twenty best students of each faculty every semester. Therefore, my cousin and his classmates dedicate their time on studying so that they can be on the list. As a result, all students gain a lot of understanding and knowledge on the subjects during these competitions. This example shows how financial support can boost the education quality in universities.
In conclusion, my view is that universities should not consider pay claim an effective way to increase quality of education. In contrast, improving teaching facilities, providing more scholarships and financial aids to students and applying higher admission standards are more efficient solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun class seems to be countable; consider using: 'many classes'.
Suggestion: many classes
...abilities were admitted and they failed many class or could not finish the degree. When my...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... their time and energy on learning which ,in turn, boosts the education quality. M...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71243523316 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1173985376 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562176165803 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3052361096 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177010973641 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553898732258 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523334258003 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10865898979 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366712974559 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.