Yes, I agree with the proposed statement. I think the increase in the professors' salary can be a good decision which all the universities throughout the world should implement it. Two main reasons can express my points of view.
First, if the professors become relived from the financial issues they can be more concentrated on their researches. A scientist can be able to think about deep problems when he has not any surrounding struggles in his personal life. As the financial problems are the one the most common issues in the every person life, with relaxing from these problems, persons can be more free for focusing on their own professions. For example, a novel idea got out the brain of the Einstein when he had been going to the Germany as a professor in physics. Until he had got stoke in his personal problems in Zurich, he could not think about gravity and the theory of the relativity. So if the professors become free from taking two or more jobs just for getting enough money they can do their main projects very well.
Second, if the professors' salary increased they can save their money and invest it on their own projects. For instance, suppose a professor in Iran who works on the drug delivery systems. When he decides to start one of his ideas, for example using Nano-particles for increasing the efficiency of the drug delivery in cancerous tissues, he clearly needs a huge amount of investments to be able to conduct his project. He needs to spend a long time for getting a grant from the university or the drug making industries. After a while he get it and start the project but meanwhile the process he need an apparatus which it does not cost too much. So if he has a good saving he can simply support a part of his project without need to any more investments. However he could get more money from the university or industries, but with own investment he did not spend his time on the getting fund process.
In conclude, I think increasing the salary of the professors can lead to the progression of the country because they are relived from the financial problems and also can invest on a part of the their ideas instead of spending more time for getting fund for any small needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... statement. I think the increase in the professors salary can be a good decision which all...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...n projects very well. Second, if the professors salary increased they can save their mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the drug delivery in cancerous tissues, he clearly needs a huge amount of invest...
^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...rug making industries. After a while he get it and start the project but meanwhile ...
^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aratus which it does not cost too much. So if he has a good saving he can simply sup...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much. So if he has a good saving he can simply support a part of his project wit...
^^
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t without need to any more investments. However he could get more money from the univer...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...oblems and also can invest on a part of the their ideas instead of spending more time for...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62025316456 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59871413854 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473417721519 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0472489748 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865228687216 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388150721349 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433191991794 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698615651157 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051752285013 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.